#Subreddit drama mods#

and I think that’s something the anti-work movement can really speak to: It’s not the only thing. They struggle with purpose or meaning in their life. “So people think, ‘Oh, if I don’t have a job, I’m not a human being.’ That’s a bit of an extreme, but some people really do feel like that – or they feel they’re less of a person because they don’t have a job.

Rupert Murdoch's son sues Australian website for defamation.

Panel details pressure campaign for unproven COVID treatment.

Former Fox News political editor says senator wanted him fired after Arizona call.

It’s an opportunity, present information and arguments that better represent the movement, don’t just hide under a rock, that wastes the audience that the interview sent to this sub.” “Let’s be realistic, this drove traffic to the sub,” wrote Gette_M_Rue, adding that “it wasn’t good publicity, but it wasn’t really bad either.

#Subreddit drama mods#

In the interest of serving these goals, the mods have routinely failed to recognize this and have stubbornly clung to their radical, anarchist views, all while enjoying the clout of modding for a nearly two million member sub.”Īnother user, however, was more positive about the entire debacle. “They’re also the first steps in any more radical changes.

The most radical ideas (Work should be an option to increase wealth, not a requirement for survival) only represent a minority of the spectrum, while active work reform, worker respect and dignity, and redistribution of stake control via unionizing are by far the majority goals,” user Killians1978 posted Thursday. “People have come to r/antiwork from all walks of life, and with different ideas of what “anti-work” means. That statement, unspurprisingly, launched a new wave of discourse - and criticism. On Thursday morning, the page appeared to be back online and public with an extensive statement outlining what steps would be taken following the Fox News interview - particularly more transparency and controls.